Tustin DMV Lawyers

DMV - WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

People experience legal problems with the Department of Motor Vehicles in many different ways. Please review the list below and click on the topic that relates to the problem that you are experiencing with the DMV. If you need additional assistance contact our California DMV hearing law firm toll free at the 877-466-5245.

DMV Issues Related To A Drug Arrest
Alcohol and Drug Related Offenses
Warrants / Default Judgments
Excessive Points / Negligent Operator
Medical Condition / Age
Appeals / Writs

THE FOLLOWING ARGUMENTS MAY SAVE YOUR DRIVING PRIVILEGE, PLEASE CONSULT YOUR WALLIN & KLARICH ATTORNEYFOR MORE DETAILS.

1. THERE IS INSUFFICIENT ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE THAT THE LICENSEE WAS DRIVING.
2. THE ARREST WAS UNLAWFUL BECAUSE THE LICENSEE WAS NOT OBSERVED BY THE OFFICER TO BE DRIVING IN HIS PRESENCE, AND THERE IS NO EXCEPTION PRESENT OF AN ACCIDENT OR OBSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC.
3. THE OFFICER LACKED PROBABLE CAUSE TO STOP THE LICENSE
4. THE LICENSEE WAS NOT UNDER ARREST AT THE TIME OF THE CHEMICAL TEST OR REFUSAL.
5. THE CHEMICAL TEST WAS ADMINISTERED BEYOND THE THREE- HOUR LIMIT.
6. THE LICENSEE ESTABLISHES A FAILURE OF THE CHEMICAL TEST TO COMPLY WITH TITLE 17 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS.
7. THE OFFICER FAILED TO FOLLOW THE BREATHMACHINE CHECKLIST.
8. THERE IS INSUFFICIENT OR CONFLICTING EVIDENCEESTABLISHING A 15-MINUTE OBSERVATION PERIOD PROCEEDING THE BREATHTEST.
9. RECORDS OBTAINED BY THE LICENSEE INDICATESIGNIFICANT OR REPEATED PROBLEMS WITH THE BREATH MACHINE.
10. THE BREATH TEST OPERATOR ( IF DIFFERENTFROM THE ARRESTING OFFICER) FAILED TO SIGN THE "OFFICERS STATEMENT"OR EQUIVALENT FORM UNDER OATH.
11. THE LABORATORY BLOOD OR URINE ANALYSISREPORT IS NOT SIGNED "AT OR NEAR" THE TIME OF ANALYSIS AS REQUIREDBY DOWNER V ZOLIN.
12. THE OFFICER FAILED TO SUBMIT A SWORN OFFICERS STATEMENT OR FAILED TO SIGN IT UNDER OATH.
13. THE DATES OR TIMES OF THE REPORT ARE CONTRADICTORYON ISSUES SUCH AS TIME OF DRIVING, ARREST, 15-MINUTE OBSERVATION,OR TEST.
14. DEFENSE EVIDENCE INDICATES A RISING BAC - THAT IS, THE BAC WAS BELOW .08% AT THE TIME OF DRIVING.
15. THE OFFICER FAILED TO PROPERLY ADVISE THE LICENSEE OF THE CONSEQUENCE OF REFUSING.
16. THE LICENSEE DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE IMPLIED CONSENT PROVISIONS DUE TO HEAD INJURY, OR THE REFUSAL WAS DUE TO OFFICER-INDUCED CONFUSION.
17. "ZERO TOLERANCE"(0% SUSPENSION UNDER 21):THE PAS DEVICE WAS NOT IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE", OR NOT PROPERLY CALIBRATED OR MAINTAINED OR WAS NOT PRECEDED BY A 15-MINUTE OBSERVATION.
18. THE OFFICER (OR OTHER WITNESS) FAILED TO RESPOND TO THE LICENSEE'S SUBPOENA.

At Wallin & Klarich, we approach every case with the belief that the person we're defending could easily be one of our own family members. We've seen firsthand how stressful legal matters can be for our clients and their loved ones. We are committed to being available to our clients at all times -- 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. If you or someone you love is facing drunk driving charges in Southern California, you should call Wallin & Klarich today for a free evaluation of your case. Call 1-888-764-2615 or fill out our online consultation form to get in contact with a legal professional today. We will be there when you call.

Click Here For FREE Answers To Your Questions